Monday, March 26, 2007

Absence of Malice

Absence of Malice does a good job addressing the ethics involved in the world of journalism and reporting. Many times journalists will not follow the proper code of conduct when collecting data to compose news columns. This is a problem that is oftentimes ignored as newspaper editors choose to turn a blind eye to this unethically obtained information. If the story will sell more copies, then the companies may bend the rules to improve the story's audience appeal. However, as Absence of Malice illustrates, unethical journalists may find short-term success by utilizing such incorrect techniques, but in the end they are typically caught and the consequences could cost them not only their current job, but also their ability to obtain future jobs because of damaged reputations.

Labels:

7 Comments:

Blogger Calcano said...

Good review. I agree with you 100% on everything you mentioned. In today's world, everything is about money and competition and reporters will do whatever they can to get the best story, even if its wrong. You are right about how it will lead them to a short stint in journalism and that is a problem that needs to be fixed. Journalists need to make sure that they are reporting what is accurate and they have more than one side of the story.

March 26, 2007 at 3:03 PM

 
Blogger Natalie said...

I agree with you. Sometimes people tend to forget that journalism is a business, which may cause some journalists to sacrifice ethics in order to sell a good story. I think the movie demonstrates this notion nicely through the character played by Sally Fields and her editor.

March 26, 2007 at 5:37 PM

 
Blogger Ryan Hughes said...

I agree editors turn their eye sometimes just to sell more newspapers or have their story on page one. I also agree reporters may find success for a short time, but eventually it will come back and get them.

March 26, 2007 at 7:06 PM

 
Blogger Karunya said...

Since newspapers are slowly losing their readership it becomes increasingly important to choose between selling what is accurate or just selling at all costs.

March 26, 2007 at 8:51 PM

 
Blogger Tsitsi Wakhisi said...

And worse, it cost innocent people their reputations, livelihoods and their lives.

March 27, 2007 at 6:27 AM

 
Blogger dpiccone1986 said...

You make a great point about journalists turning a blind eye to certain journalists antics. Also, I believe that a journalist is only as good as his or her editor. The editor has to know when to pull on the reins of his/her journalist, and give the guidance; that was one aspect of the movie I think went unaddressed.

March 27, 2007 at 9:57 AM

 
Blogger Andi Wandt said...

I was surprised to see that the editor was the one to encourage Sally Field to step over the line, in order to make a headline or sell more papers. I think you're right, this is dangerous because it not only can hurt others but even the reporters themselves.

March 27, 2007 at 6:50 PM

 

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home